|
"I hate to think he was saying the tribal population doesn't matter," she said. "DEQ staff was thinking statistically, but because
Oregon has so many people, not just tribal people, who consume wildlife and fish, the accuracy of fish consumption rates is very important in
determining health effects."
Fish eaters, Hampton said, need to know that the amount of toxins allowed under the new rule assumes a certain level of consumption
and that Native Americans exceed that EPA average
"It would be wise to be informed about the level of consumption and the toxic risk it poses to them," she said.
During deliberations by the EQC, before the vote, Commissioner Ken Williamson noted that EPA has "huge safety factors" built into
their risk assessment. Hampton said she found those safety factors reassuring, but still expressed her opinion about the adopted consumption rate.
"Partly because of where I live and work, I take for granted that people consume large quantities of fish, so I have a hard time
accepting the national rate is what we should be using," Hampton said. "As a citizen and lifelong resident of Oregon, I think this amount is
ridiculous. I have a daughter in Illinois who says people there don't know what a fish looks like. I can't think that the typical Midwesterner eats as
much fish as a person from the Pacific Northwest."
|